Sovereign AI knowledge infrastructure

Knowledge
your business can trust.

Embedry turns your documents into a closed, auditable knowledge system. Every answer cites its source. Every answer is reproducible. Nothing ever leaves your infrastructure.

On-premise · GDPR-native · AI-Act-ready v0.1 - Early access

This is not
another local chat.

The market is full of AI tools that answer confidently and forget the question by tomorrow. Different model, different answer. No way to verify, no way to audit, and your data is somewhere else by then.

Embedry takes the opposite position: a deterministic knowledge layer that runs entirely inside your perimeter, returns the same answer to the same question, and refuses to invent when the evidence isn't there.

Most AI chats

  • Send your data to someone else's cloud
  • Different answer every time
  • No source, no citation, no audit trail
  • Hallucinate when data is missing
  • Replaced by next month's model

Embedry

  • Runs entirely on your servers
  • Same question → same answer
  • Every claim cites the exact source
  • Returns "not found" instead of guessing
  • Model-agnostic - outlives any vendor

Designed for the moments
when being wrong has a cost.

01 / Closed loop

Data stays inside your perimeter.

Embedry is deployed on your hardware or your private cloud. Documents, embeddings, and queries never leave your network. GDPR is satisfied by architecture, not by a clause in a contract.

02 / Verified

Every answer carries its evidence.

Each response returns the source document, the exact section, and a confidence score. If the knowledge base doesn't support a claim, the system returns null not a polished guess.

03 / Reproducible

Ask twice, get the same answer.

Embedry pins the embedding model, the version, and the retrieval logic for every document it indexes. The same question on the same corpus returns the same result last week, today, and in two years.

Trust isn't a tone of voice.
It's a citation.

We don't ask you to take the AI's word for it. Every response is structured: an answer, the documents it came from, the specific sections, and a confidence score per source. You can hand it to a compliance officer. You can hand it to a court.

Hallucination rate
0%*
Audit trail
Per claim
POST /api/query Verified
Question
Under our retention policy, how long must client correspondence be archived after a contract ends?
Answer
Seven years from the date of contract termination. Records may be moved to cold storage after year three, but must remain auditable.
  • Records_Retention_Policy_v4.pdf Section 3.2 · Client correspondence
    0.97
  • Compliance_Handbook_2025.pdf Chapter 8 · Archival standards
    0.91
  • Audit_Trail_Requirements.pdf Appendix B · Cold storage
    0.84

From scattered documents
to a single source of truth.

01 / Ingest

Drop in everything you have.

PDFs, Word, scanned reports, XML, structured records, web pages. Embedry normalises every format into a unified knowledge structure - with automatic entity extraction and minimal manual tagging.

02 / Connect

A semantic map links what belongs together.

Concepts across thousands of documents are linked even when they never reference each other. Your 2019 archive and last week's update become one network.

03 / Answer

Query through a single, stable API.

Power your internal chat, client portal, reporting dashboard, or any workflow from one verified knowledge layer. Build once. Run anywhere your data lives.

Built for places where
a wrong answer is a real problem.

Medical research libraries

Thousands of papers, trials, protocols. Query with clinical precision. Every answer arrives with its PMIDs and exact sections attached.

Example · Clinical knowledge base

Legal & compliance archives

Regulations, contracts, case law. Every response cites the exact clause. No paraphrasing the law, no guesswork in regulated environments.

Example · Mid-size law firm

Internal knowledge that outlives turnover

SOPs, manuals, past project files, decisions and their reasoning. New hires find answers in seconds. Expertise stops walking out the door.

Example · Engineering & operations

Product catalogue intelligence

Thousands of SKUs, datasheets, supplier specs. Ask "what fits this requirement?" and get a verified answer - not a hopeful one.

Example · Industrial distribution

Clinical documentation

Drug interactions, treatment guidelines, internal protocols - structured, retrievable, and exportable with full audit trails.

Example · Hospital system

Editorial & publishing

Your archive becomes your editorial engine. Generate summaries, briefings, and articles grounded only in verified internal sources.

Example · Specialist publisher

Models change every six months.
Your knowledge layer shouldn't.

Embedry is deliberately model-agnostic. The intelligence lives in the retrieval, the graph, and the audit trail not in any particular LLM. When the model market shifts again, your infrastructure stays intact.

- 01

Document lineage, not just storage

Every document is fingerprinted and versioned. The exact state of the corpus at the moment any answer was produced is reproducible - months or years later.

- 02

Governance built in, not bolted on

Access controls, approval flows, and audit exports are part of the platform - not a future enterprise module. Designed for organisations that already answer to regulators.

- 03

Sovereign by design

No phone-home, no telemetry, no managed-service dependency. Disconnect the internet and Embedry keeps answering. That's what data sovereignty actually means.

The knowledge is already yours.
It's time to actually own it.

Embedry is in early access for organisations in regulated industries across the EU. If verifiable, sovereign, deterministic AI infrastructure is on your roadmap, we'd like to hear about your corpus.

How it works

Follow one document
through the system -
and see why it changes everything.

Scroll. The animation on the left shows where your data goes. The story on the right shows what that means for your business.

YOUR INFRASTRUCTURE
PDF
DOCX
XML
TXT
SCAN
HTML
CLOUD
What's our retention period for client records?
TYPICAL AI
"Generally between 5 and 10 years, depending on jurisdiction…"
SOURCES
none provided
QUESTION
What's our retention period for client records?
VERIFIED ANSWER
Seven years from contract termination.
SOURCES
Retention_Policy_v4.pdf
Compliance_Handbook
Audit_Requirements
DATA NEVER CROSSES THIS BOUNDARY
Act 01
The pain

Knowledge scattered across a thousand files, nobody can find anything.

Your organisation has produced years of expertise - contracts, policies, manuals, research. It lives in shared drives, in inboxes, in someone's head. When a colleague leaves, a chunk leaves with them. When a question comes up, the right document is somewhere - but where?

→ EMBEDRY Every file becomes part of one searchable knowledge layer. No re-tagging. No migration. The structure you already have stays exactly as it is.
Act 02
The pain

Every document pasted into a public AI tool is a small leak.

Cloud AI tools are powerful - and they want your data. Every contract pasted in, every internal memo summarised, every client name mentioned. Once it leaves your network, you don't control it anymore. Your legal team knows this. That's why they keep saying no.

→ EMBEDRY Runs entirely inside your perimeter. Your hardware, your private cloud - your call. No outbound traffic. No telemetry. Disconnect the internet and Embedry keeps working.
Act 03
The shift

Your documents become structured knowledge.

Embedry parses each document, understands its structure, and converts it into a form that supports precise semantic search. The processing happens once, locally, on your machine. The result is a knowledge layer you actually own.

→ THE PAYOFF Day-one search. Mid-sized corpus indexed within hours. The same chat interface your team already understands - backed by your own data instead of someone else's model.
Act 04
The pain

AI that answers confidently even when it shouldn't.

A generic AI tool will give you a confident-sounding answer to almost any question. It will sound right. It will be plausible. And in regulated environments, that's the most dangerous failure mode there is - because nobody can tell when it's wrong.

→ EMBEDRY If the corpus doesn't support a claim, the system returns null with a reason. No fabrication. No hallucination. Confident silence is better than confident wrong.
Act 05
The resolution

Every answer arrives with its evidence.

Document, section, confidence score - every claim is cited and verifiable. Months later, you can reconstruct exactly how any answer was produced. Hand it to legal. Hand it to an auditor. Hand it to a regulator. The system is auditable by construction.

→ THE PAYOFF Compliance-ready by design - not as a future enterprise add-on. Reproducible answers. Full lineage. The kind of AI you can actually defend in a meeting.

What clients actually want to know,
before they commit.

Does anything ever leave our network?
No. Embedry is deployed inside your perimeter - your own hardware or your own private cloud. Documents, embeddings, queries, and answers all stay local. The system has no telemetry, no auto-update phone-home, no managed-service dependency. Disconnect the internet and Embedry keeps working.
What if a question has no good answer in our documents?
The system returns null with a reason - explicitly. We consider this a feature, not a failure. Generic AI tools answer confidently even when they shouldn't. Embedry is designed for organisations where a confident wrong answer is more dangerous than no answer at all.
How is this different from a search engine on top of our files?
A search engine returns documents. Embedry returns evidence-grounded answers - composed from passages with confidence scores and full attribution. It also understands meaning, not just keywords: "What is our SLA?" finds the relevant clause even if those exact words never appear in the document.
Will the same question always give the same answer?
Yes - provided the corpus hasn't changed. The retrieval is deterministic and the model version is pinned in the passport. This is why audit reconstruction is possible months or years later.
What happens when AI models improve in two years?
You upgrade the engine without rebuilding your knowledge layer. The store, the passport, and the document lineage stay intact - only the retrieval components change. Your architecture outlasts any individual model.
What does "audit-ready" actually mean here?
Every answer carries: the documents used, the sections quoted, the confidence per source, the engine version, the model version, and a timestamp. Together this is enough to satisfy traceability requirements under the EU AI Act for high-risk AI applications.

Stop trusting answers
you cannot verify.

Embedry is in early access for organisations across the EU where verifiability isn't optional. The conversation starts with a look at your corpus.

nomic-embed-text · bge-m3
KV
Termination clause liability
Today · 4 sources
NDA confidentiality scope 2024
Yesterday · 7 sources
Force majeure interpretation
2 days ago · 3 sources
Contract review criteria
4 days ago · 5 sources
EU compliance updates 2025
1 week ago · 6 sources
Commercial law overview
1 week ago · 9 sources
You
What liability remains after early termination of the service agreement, and which notice period applies?
EMBEDRY
Based on the indexed corpus, early termination does not release either party from payment obligations already accrued, confidentiality duties, or liability for prior breaches. The agreement requires 30 days written notice unless termination is triggered by a material breach.

If the breach is curable, the defaulting party receives a 14-day cure period. If the breach is not cured within that window, termination becomes effective immediately after written confirmation. The indexed documents do not support any broader penalty beyond unpaid fees and documented direct damages.
Service_Agreement_Termination_2024 0.97
Contract_Law_Review 0.91
CONFIDENCE
0.94
You
Is there a non-compete restriction after the agreement ends?
EMBEDRY
The indexed documents do not contain a standalone post-termination non-compete clause. There is one indirect reference to non-solicitation of employees, but no restriction preventing either party from working with competing service providers.

Recommendation: ingest the signed master services agreement and all annexes before treating this as a final legal position.
NOT FOUND IN KNOWLEDGE BASE
send ⇧⏎ new line 3 docs active
Sources 2 used · 47 total
Service_Agreement_Termination_2024.pdf
0.97
Clause 12 Termination and survival
Accrued payment obligations, confidentiality duties, and liability for breaches occurring before termination survive expiry or early termination of the agreement.
SHA·a3f7c2
v2.1
2024-11-03
Contract_Law_Review.pdf
0.91
Section 4.2 Contract interpretation
Survival clauses are interpreted narrowly unless the contract expressly extends additional restrictions beyond termination or expiry.
SHA·8d12e9
v1.0
2024-08-15
45 more documents in corpus.
Not retrieved for this query.
POST /api/v1/query
200 OK · 248ms
// query
"query": "Termination clause liability",
"answer": "30 days notice; accrued obligations survive…",
"sources": [
{ "doc": "Service_Agreement_Termination_2024", "score": 0.97 },
{ "doc": "Contract_Law_Review", "score": 0.91 }
],
"confidence": 0.94,
"hallucination_risk": "none"
47 documents indexed
KV
Collections
All documents 47
Contract templates 12
Legal memos 19
Regulatory files 8
Case notes 8
Filter by type
PDF PDF documents 31
XML JATS / XML 9
MD Markdown 7
Drop files or click to upload
PDF, XML, DOCX, MD, TXT
Document Author Date Version Status
PDF
Service_Agreement_Termination_2024.pdf
PDF indexed
Müller et al.
2024-11-03
v2.1
Indexed
PDF
Contract_Law_Review.pdf
PDF indexed
Pertwee, R.G.
2024-08-15
v1.0
Indexed
XML
EU_Compliance_Framework_2025.xml
XML indexed
EMA / EMCDDA
2025-01-12
v3.0
Indexed
PDF
NDA_Confidentiality_Analysis.pdf
PDF indexed
Kayser et al.
2024-06-20
v1.2
Indexed
MD
Clause_Library.md
MD indexed
legal ops team
2025-03-08
v4.0
Indexed
PDF
Opioid_replacement_therapy_RCT.pdf
PDF
processing
Fischer et al.
2025-04-01
v1.0
Processing
Service_Agreement_Termination_2024.pdf
Author
Müller et al.
Date
2024-11-03
Version
v2.1
Chunks
148
Model
bge-m3
Status
Indexed
Document Passport
SHA-256 a3f7c2d9e1b4...
Embed model bge-m3 · 1.0.1
Ingested 2024-11-04 09:14
Pages 24 pages

Service Agreement: Early Termination Review

This review analyzes the termination mechanics of a commercial services agreement. Clause 12.3 defines notice requirements, cure periods, and obligations that survive termination.

Primary focus: whether early termination affects accrued payment obligations. Secondary focus: confidentiality, limitation of liability, and non-solicitation language.

Conclusion the agreement preserves accrued fees and confidentiality duties after termination. No explicit post-termination non-compete clause was found in the indexed text.

Indexed semantic chunks (148 total)
chunk_001 chunk_002 chunk_003 chunk_004 chunk_005 +143 more
47 graph links
KV
Results for
termination liability notice period
Docs 12
Keywords 38
Relations 24
Service_Agreement_Termination_2024.pdf
0.97
Commercial agreement review covering early termination, cure periods, and surviving obligations.
termination notice clause liability
Contract_Law_Review.pdf
0.91
Review memo on contract interpretation, survival clauses, and limitation of liability.
notice clause survival
NDA_confidentiality_analysis.pdf
0.74
Analysis of confidentiality obligations and employee non-solicitation after contract expiry.
confidentiality NDA
Liability_Cap_2023.pdf
0.68
Comparative analysis of liability caps, exclusions, and direct damages language.
data processing damages
EU_compliance_framework_2025.xml
0.52
EU regulatory framework for commercial data handling and contractual notices.
EU regulation
shared entities clause evidence review trail notice receptor oral notice liability onset liability damages Termination liability 148 chunks Contract review 84 chunks NDA obligations 62 chunks EU compliance 211 chunks Clause library 93 chunks Data processing pending Liability cap 31 chunks Risk review 47 chunks
drag to rotate · wheel to zoom
Selected
Document
Keyword
Document preview
PDF · 24 pp
Service_Agreement_Termination_2024.pdf
Müller et al. · 2024-11-03
v2.1 indexed
Double-blind RCT (N=218) assessing termination efficacy for chronic contractual liability across three notice arms over 8-week follow-up.
Score
0.97
Chunks
148
Connections
7
Pages
24
Passport
SHA-256a3f7c2d9e1b4…
Embed modelbge-m3 · 1.0.1
Top keywordstermination, notice, liability
Final product interface may differ
Open the demo in a desktop browser
The interactive product interface is designed for a full browser viewport.